Friday, June 6, 2014

Fact and Opinion - Shame on you Neil deGrasse Tyson

"The good thing about science is that it is true whether you believe it or not" - Neil deGrasse Tyson 

This is a little offensive. The more appropriate quote should be 

"The good thing about a Fact is that it is true whether you believe it or not"

I agree this is a characteristic of a Fact. What bother's me is Neil's rather overt assertion that science equals fact. Neil's statement is really Neil's opinion presented as a fact.  And to claim that all things scientific should be considered fact is a rather bold ASSERTION, something that ironically is not very scientific. 

(Science isn't even a "thing" whose veracity can be tested.  It is a way of doing things, a process for the careful observation and testing of theories, in the hopes of identifying a fact.  But now i'm just being nit picky about his choice of words.)

I'm actually bothered in general by the liberal use of the word Fact to describe things that really are debatable.  What we need is a little more clarity on the definition of a Fact, and less about the characteristics of a Fact.

Here are some "Facts" that have been presented to me of late:
1) Everything Scientific is factual
2) Global warming is Man made
3) Being a stay at home mom is better for your kids than being a working mom
4) Openly carrying a weapon is unsafe
5) People are inherently misogynistic, racist, and discriminatory
6) Vaccines cause autism 

I'm not here to debate any of these "facts" that isn't the point of this post.  The point is that people are very liberal in their use of the word Fact and then have the audacity to defend these "facts" by using Neil's assertion.  Basically saying that they are true whether the person they are debating with believes them or not.  Like that is the end of the discussion.

Dictonary.com defines fact in 5 ways, but i'm only going to list the first one: 
1) something that actually exists; reality; truth: 

To claim something is a Fact is to claim objective reality.  People may not realize how BOLD of a claim this is.  This is big time.  You are essentially claiming that what you are saying is irrefutable, that there is no possible valid argument against it, that this is a true description of reality.  That regardless of your beliefs or values to the contrary you must acknowledge this Fact.  This Fact can have potentially life changing implications.  Some people realize this when they proclaim a fact, but others do so without any regard.

So, first of all, understand what you are claiming.  


Second, if you claiming a fact, be responsible and actually have real evidence to support this "fact". Give some actual thought to how you are going to prove your "fact" and make sure it is legit. Because asking people to change their view of reality is no small ask, and doing so flippantly is highly irresponsible and potentially dangerous.  You may need to take responsibility for some of the fallout that this fact may cause.  Understanding of reality affects every part of our lives.

Third, the inverse of the above quote is also true: 

"Just because you believe something doesn't make it factual or not factual."  

Don't use your belief, or other's, as evidence of your "fact"  Beliefs aren't always based on or affected by Facts.  Do use the sciences, the legal system, and historical research to help uncover facts.  You should feel OBLIGATED to do so.

In conclusion, if you don't have the backing to call your statement a Fact, then just call it what it is, an opinion.  It isn't as pretentious as claiming a fact, and requires a lot less research.  It shows some humility and has the pleasant side affect of not fucking with people's reality. And people get violently defensive about their reality.


On a different but related point beliefs/opinions can be just as powerful and life changing as Facts, but they aren't as concrete.  We have two different words for a reason.  Use them correctly.

3 comments:

  1. So by way of correction here, I went back and watched the interview with Colbert where Tyson made the sound byte I quote here. The complete quote is actually much more precise than I originally gave him credit for.
    The more complete quote is:
    "What I’m saying is, when different experiments give you the same result, it is no longer subject to your opinion. That’s the good thing about science: It’s true whether or not you believe in it. That’s why it works.”
    The link to the actual video can be found here if you are interested, thanks to my friend John.
    http://www.salon.com/2014/03/11/neil_degrasse_tyson_science_is_true_whether_or_not_you_believe_in_it/
    So shame on me for not checking the source in the first place!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brad,

    Statements are hard to analyze out of context.

    Sounds like something that I struggle with on a daily basis. Communication and epistemolgy, or the study of knowledge. Or, how do we "know". This is intimately wrapped up with Science, Religion, Philosophy, etc. I consider myself a critical realist - I beleive there is an absolute truth that exists (facts), but our conceptual frameworks as humans only capture some of the absolute truth. This is an inherently humble position, because I don't think that I have grasped all of the absolute truth. Additionally, others with different conceptual frameworks may have grasped some of the absolute truth. However, my emotions and limited communication skills often miscommunicate what I want to say.

    When people quote scriptures, statements, or references, I reccommend cynicism. Often a quote is not simply a shortcut to communicate, or way to give others' credit... but an attempt to validate a position with intellectual rhetoric.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Often a quote is not simply a shortcut to communicate, or way to give others' credit... but an attempt to validate a position with intellectual rhetoric." BOOM that is an excellent statement. can i quote you on that? (irony intended)

    I also have discovered that communicating truth can be almost as difficult as discerning it. That is one reason i do try to put a lot of thought into my writing, especially on controversial subjects.

    ReplyDelete